**Please note the registration will be closed 2 days (48 Hours) prior to the date of the seminar.
An effective complaint handling system is an extremely important part of any quality system. Manufacturers should understand that any complaint received on a product shall be evaluated and, if necessary, thoroughly investigated and analyzed, and corrective action shall be taken.
The results of this evaluation should lead to a conclusion regarding whether the complaint was valid, what the root cause of the complaint was, and what action is necessary to prevent further occurrences. Complaints cannot be ignored. They are an excellent indicator of problems with the use, design, and/or manufacture of a product. A single complaint that is thoroughly investigated may lead a company to take remedial or corrective action. It may also take an ongoing analysis of numerous complaints before a trend is spotted that causes a company to initiate changes in their product, labeling, packaging or distribution. The regulatory expectations for both pharmaceuticals and medical devices will be emphasized as well as overview of best practices for timely and effective investigations. Trending is the only way a company can stay on top of emerging quality issues and address those that are most pressing.
Medical Device Reporting (MDR) is the mechanism for FDA to receive significant medical device adverse events from manufacturers, importers and user facilities, so they can be detected and corrected quickly. User Facilities (e.g., hospitals, nursing homes) are required to report suspected medical device related deaths to both the FDA and the manufacturers. User facilities report medical device related serious injuries only to the manufacturer. If the medical device manufacturer is unknown, the serious injury is reported by the facility to FDA. Health professionals within a user-facility should familiarize themselves with their institution procedures for reporting adverse events to the FDA.
The MDR process impacts device user facilities, manufacturers, importers, and distributors. If you are a device user facility, you must report deaths and serious injuries that a device has or may have caused or contributed to, establish and maintain adverse event files, and submit summary annual reports. If you are a manufacturer or importer, you must report deaths and serious injuries that your device has or may have caused or contributed to, you must report certain device malfunctions, and you must establish and maintain adverse event files. If you are a manufacturer, you must also submit specified follow-up.
Recall means the correction or removal of a device for human use where FDA finds that there is a reasonable probability that the device would cause serious, adverse health consequences or death. It is an action taken to address a problem with a medical device that violates FDA law. Recalls occur when a medical device is defective, when it could be a risk to health, or when it is both defective and a risk to health.
A medical device recall does not always mean that you must stop using the product or return it to the company. A recall sometimes means that the medical device needs to be checked, adjusted, or fixed. If an implanted device (for example, a pacemaker or an artificial hip) is recalled, it does not always have to be removed. When an implanted device has the potential to fail unexpectedly, companies often tell doctors to contact their patients to discuss the risk of removing the device compared to the risk of leaving it in place. FDA classifies medical device recalls into three categories, representing the potential risk to public health: Class I, II, and III.
Medical Device Reporting
Exercise and Recap of Day 1
|1||2 Attendees||10% off|
|2||3 to 6 Attendees||20% off|
|3||7 to 10 Attendees||25% off|
|4||10+ Attendees||30% off|
To avail the above group discounts, all the participants should register by making a single payment
Call our representative TODAY on 1800 447 9407 to have your seats confirmed!
David R. Dills, Global Regulatory Affairs & Compliance Consultant, has an accomplished record with more than 26 years of experience within regulatory affairs, compliance and quality consultative services for early-stage/established Class I/II/III medical devices, IVDs, and bio/pharmaceutical manufacturers on the global landscape. Previously employed, with increasing responsibilities by device manufacturers and consultancies, including a globally recognized CRO, has worked directly with and for manufacturers engaged in compliance remediation activities involving consent decrees, CIA's, FDA warning letters, and customer generated compliance events, provides Strategic GxP Compliance and Regulatory Consulting, handles all aspects of global regulatory submissions and dossiers, including 510(k), PMA, Design Dossiers, Technical Files, CMC, NDA, and IDE submissions, currently serves as a U.S. Agent, works with stakeholders and Center Reviewers regarding submission meetings/negotiations, clinical affairs, and provides regulatory submissions and post-market project leadership/guidance covering different therapeutic and medical specialties based on classification. His background encompasses broad capabilities in regulatory and compliance oversight and governance, including CAPA, Design Controls, Validation, Software Quality with regulatory oversight, FDA Mock Inspections, remediating documentation management systems, Supplier Quality, Adverse Event Reporting, Product Complaints, GxP Training, interpretation and applicability of FDA and international regulations and standards, postmarketing surveillance, ISO 13485 and CE Mark, Medical Device/IVD/Active Implantable Directives. Mr. Dills leads and manages efforts involving multi-country product registrations and licensing in Asia Pacific, EMEA and The Americas from premarketing to postmarketing, and works with the Regulatory Authorities and strives to provide consistent, practical compliance solutions that work with reduction of regulatory compliance risk.